DBS Barring Law

VW appealed ISA’s decision not to remove him from the Children’s barred list. Convicted for possession and making of indecent images (levels 1,2 and 3). VW was sentenced to a community order with a supervision requirement, and to register on the sex offenders register for 5 years. Along with other images, he had the

VT appealed against ISA's decision to place him on the children’s barred list. VT had been subject to an automatic barring due to accepting a caution for possession of indecent images of children. He had been invited to make representations as to why he should be removed from the list. The ISA decided to

The appellant was a staff nurse at an elderly care unit. KS was referred to the ISA by the Dept. of Health. He was placed on adult barred list. ISA found two of the allegations unsubstantiated but three other allegations were upheld on “the balance of probabilities” that he had engaged in “relevant conduct” which

SB barred placed on children’s barred list. Appealed ISA decision to Upper Tribunal on the basis that it was a disproportionate – error of law. Appeal granted. Rolled up hearing, The Queen on the Application of Vetterlein v Hampshire County Council and Hampshire Waste Services Ltd [2001] EWHC Admin 560 referenced [para 7]. Tribunal

SJB Convicted of sexual activity with a child under 18 in abuse of a position of trust. Sentenced to a community order with supervision for two year, and was disqualified via a Disqualification Order from working with children under section 28 CJCS Act 2000. Facts SJB  was a full time teacher at a school in