<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>DBS Archives - Police Caution Removal Solicitors</title>
	<atom:link href="https://policecautions.uk/category/dbs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://policecautions.uk/category/dbs/</link>
	<description>Police Caution Removed Solicitors</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 13:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.2</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>What Shows up on an Enhanced DBS check?</title>
		<link>https://policecautions.uk/2019/02/06/what-shows-up-on-an-enhanced-dbs-check/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Elkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2019 15:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Criminal Records & Police Caution Questions and Answers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Appeals Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Barred Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disclosure and Barring Service]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.policecautions.uk/?p=1721</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>What shows up on an enhanced DBS check is subject to detailed procedural rules. There are certain categories of police disposals and convictions that will automatically be disclosed on a standard and enhanced DBS certificate. Along with disclosing information according to defined categories, an Enhanced DBS Certificate can also include information on the basis</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2019/02/06/what-shows-up-on-an-enhanced-dbs-check/">What Shows up on an Enhanced DBS check?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://policecautions.uk">Police Caution Removal Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-1 nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-0 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-one-full fusion-column-first fusion-column-last" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-margin-bottom:0px;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-1"><p>What shows up on an enhanced DBS check is subject to detailed procedural rules.</p>
<p>There are certain categories of police disposals and convictions that will automatically be disclosed on a standard and enhanced DBS certificate.</p>
<p>Along with disclosing information according to defined categories, an Enhanced DBS Certificate can also include information on the basis of the police&#8217;s opinion as to its relevance, and whether it ought to be included on a certificate.</p>
<p>Before an enhanced DBS certificate can be issued, it must also be show that questions being asked about a person&#8217;s criminal record are for a &#8220;prescribed purpose&#8221;. Prescribed purposes are broadly speaking working with children and vulnerable adults, as well as other specific areas such as becoming a Commissioner for the Gambling Commission, or holding a license to produce controlled drugs under Regulation 5 of the Misuse of Drugs Regulations.</p>
<p><em><strong><a href="https://policecautions.uk/2019/01/31/what-is-the-impact-of-the-2019-supreme-court-decision-on-disclosure-of-youth-cautions-warnings-and-reprimands-and-also-adult-cautions/">NB: November 2020 edit</a>: </strong></em>Youth cautions, warnings and reprimands are immediately  &#8220;protected&#8221; subsequent to changes implemented by the government. This means that even for offences that appear on the DBS list of unfilterable offences, they will not be automatically be disclosed on an enhanced and standard DBS check. It should be noted however despite the changes, it is still possible for facts related to youth cautions, warnings or reprimands to still be disclosed on an enhanced DBS certificate if the police feel the information is &#8220;relevant&#8221;. </p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">Disclosure of Relevant Information on an Enhanced DBS Certificate</h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The issue as to what information might be relevant to be disclosed on an enhanced<a href="https://www.supremecourt.uk/cases/docs/uksc-2016-0144-judgment.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"> DBS certificate came under renewed scrutiny by the Supreme Court in 2018.</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The appellant in the case had been acquitted of rape, he was a qualified teacher, but was working at the time as a taxi driver. It had been alleged that he had raped a 17-year-old woman, who was a passenger in a taxi driven by him. His defence was that there had never been sexual contact with the alleged victim.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Following his acquittal, he applied for an enhanced DBS certificate in connection with an application for a job as a lecturer. The <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2025/03/26/deletion-of-arrest-records-for-rape-allegations/">rape allegation</a> and prosecution was disclosed on his enhanced DBS check as being relevant information to his job application.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The appellant appealed the disclosure of his rape acquittal &#8211; the appellant argued that his acquittal had proved his innocence:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>It is wrong, unfair and grossly prejudicial [that] I should have to defend myself every time I apply for employment after the jury have ruled I am an innocent man.</p>
<p><cite>(Para 9 of Judgement)</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On appeal the police stated that they did not feel that his acquittal had amounted to proving his innocence, but only showed that the allegation could not be proven beyond a reasonable doubt:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>Although the applicant was found not guilty by the jury, the test for criminal conviction is beyond all reasonable doubt, which is higher than that required for CRB disclosure purposes. Therefore the applicant&#8217;s acquittal does not prove that he was innocent, or even that the jury thought he was innocent, just that he could not be proved guilty beyond all reasonable doubt …</p>
<p><cite>Para 12 of Judgement</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The police concluded that they felt that the test for disclosure of relevant information was that it needed to be more likely to be true than not, which is effectively the civil standard of proof:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>the legislation and guidance is clear that allegations that might not be true can be disclosed&#8230; I believe that the information is more likely to be true than false and is not lacking in substance, and it is reasonable to believe that the information might be true, and therefore it passes the required test</p>
<p><cite>Para 12 of Judgement</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>After deciding that the acquittal was relevant information, the police also concluded that it was reasonable and proportionate to disclose it.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>On appeal to the Supreme Court it was contested that it was a breach of the appellant&#8217;s right to a private life for his acquittal to be disclosed on his enhanced DBS check.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Court did not agree with the appellant and stated that it was lawful to disclose non-conviction information. The Court stated that the police did not need to undertake a detailed assessment of evidence to the civil standard of proof. The court indicated that where there was evidence that tended to confirm innocence, then it might be inappropriate to disclose. The Court stated as follows:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>68. While I do not question the actual decision in that case, I cannot accept that, as a matter of domestic law or under article 8 , it is necessary or appropriate for those responsible for an ECRC to conduct a &#8220;detailed analysis&#8221; of the evidence at the trial, such as envisaged by Coulson J. That is the task of the judge and jury, who have the advantage of seeing and hearing the witnesses. Whether or not it would be compatible with article 6.2 for the chief officer to express a view on the merits of the case following an acquittal, it is not the proper function of an officer to attempt to replicate the role of the court, or (in Ms Richards&#8217; words) to conduct a &#8220;mini-trial&#8221;. Nor can that be read into the language of the statute. His task under section 113B is to identify and disclose relevant &#8220;information&#8221;, not to make a separate assessment of the evidence at trial. As Mr Moffett&#8217;s examples show (para 52 above), additional information may in some cases be available about the circumstances of the acquittal, including possibly the court&#8217;s own statements about it, which may give reasons for treating the court&#8217;s disposal as less than decisive. By contrast in the case considered by Wyn Williams J (para 36 above) the available information should have been taken as a positive indication of innocence. However, in the absence of information of that kind, it is not the officers&#8217; job to fill the gap. To the extent that Ms Wilson in the present case saw it as part of her task to assess whether, in the light of the evidence at trial, the allegation was &#8220;more likely to be true than false&#8221;, she was in error.<br />69. The judge did not make the same error. He went no further than to accept, as he was entitled to do, the Chief Constable&#8217;s view that the information was &#8220;not lacking substance&#8221; and that the allegations &#8220;might be true&#8221;. However, that in itself did not mean that disclosure was disproportionate. It was a matter for him to assess whether the information, albeit in the limited form contained in the ECRC, was of sufficient weight in the article 8 balance.</p>
<p><cite>Paras 68/69 of Judgement</cite></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>In a postscript to the case the Court confirmed that non-conviction information could be disclosed on an enhanced DBS checks, including acquittals:</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote class="wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow">
<p>74 Given that Parliament has clearly authorised the inclusion in ECRCs of &#8220;soft&#8221; information, including disputed allegations, there may be no logical reason to exclude information about serious allegations of criminal conduct, merely because a prosecution has not been pursued or has failed. In principle, even acquittal by a criminal court following a full trial can be said to imply no more than that the charge has not been proved beyond reasonable doubt. In principle, it leaves open the possibility that the allegation was true, and the risks associated with that.</p>
<p><cite>Para 74 of Judgement<br /></cite></p></blockquote>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Court did however also indicate that there was a lack of guidance for employers as to how to deal with, and interpret, acquittals disclosed on <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2019/11/03/can-you-appeal-a-dbs-check/">Enhanced DBS checks</a>. As a result of this indication new guidelines for employers may be drawn up.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<h2 class="wp-block-heading">DBS Defence Solicitors</h2>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">If you have received an enhanced DBS certificate and it has disclosed information that you dispute or that you feel is unfair, <a href="https://www.policecautions.uk/contact/">please get in touch</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">We have significant experience in challenging enhanced DBS checks and also barring appeals.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p class="wp-block-paragraph">Unfortunately we do not offer legal aid, but can usually offer reasonable fixed fees.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</div><div class="fusion-clearfix"></div></div></div></div></div><p>The post <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2019/02/06/what-shows-up-on-an-enhanced-dbs-check/">What Shows up on an Enhanced DBS check?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://policecautions.uk">Police Caution Removal Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>DBS Barring List Success</title>
		<link>https://policecautions.uk/2017/11/08/dbs-barring-list-success/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Elkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2017 19:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Barred List Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Police Caution, Arrest Record, Local Record Removals and DBS Cases]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Appeals Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Barred Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[department of Education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Disclosure and Barring Service]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.policecautions.uk/?p=1095</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>We have successfully applied to have our client removed from the Disclosure and Barings Services’ (DBS) Barred lists. The client had been placed on the barred list under the former Department of Education and Skills (DfES) list 99 procedure. The client had never been convicted of any criminal offence, but was simply the subject</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2017/11/08/dbs-barring-list-success/">DBS Barring List Success</a> appeared first on <a href="https://policecautions.uk">Police Caution Removal Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-2 nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-1 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-one-full fusion-column-first fusion-column-last" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-column-wrapper-legacy"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-2"><p>We have successfully applied to have our client removed from the <a href="https://www.policecautions.uk/dbs-barred-list/">Disclosure and Barings Services’ (DBS) Barred lists</a>.</p>
<p>The client had been placed on the barred list under the former Department of Education and Skills (DfES) list 99 procedure.</p>
<p>The client had never been convicted of any criminal offence, but was simply the subject of a spurious allegation from over 15 years previously.</p>
<p>The government has significant powers to disclose information, and take barring decisions about individuals, even where no actual criminal conviction has taken place.</p>
<p>If the DBS believe that an allegation made against you is more likely to be true than not, and if it is necessary and proportionate to do so in their view, you will be placed on either the children or adults, or both, barred lists.</p>
</div><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-1 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-two" style="--awb-margin-top-small:0px;--awb-margin-right-small:0px;--awb-margin-bottom-small:20px;--awb-margin-left-small:0px;"><h2 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left" style="margin:0;">DBS Barred Lists Solicitors</h2><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container"><div class="title-sep sep-double sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-3"><p>Our client had lived for many years under the shadow of the allegation, and the fear that he would be arrested again for a perceived infraction of the barring requirements. Eventually the fear outweighed his concern, and he approached us to try to have himself removed from the list.</p>
<p>After obtaining the file of evidence from various sources, we were able to identify some serious defects in the way the original barring decision had been made. We also argued that continuing to bar our client was disproportionate, unnecessary, and plainly unfair.</p>
<p>We managed to persuade the DBS, within a relatively short period of time, that the client ought to be removed from the children’s bared list.</p>
</div><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-2 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-two" style="--awb-margin-top-small:0px;--awb-margin-right-small:0px;--awb-margin-bottom-small:20px;--awb-margin-left-small:0px;"><h2 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left" style="margin:0;">DBS Certificates and Police Records</h2><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container"><div class="title-sep sep-double sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-4"><p>Now that the client is removed from the barred list, we are now applying for the expungement of all police records related to the allegations.</p>
<p>Even if an accused is removed from the barred list, the police may still disclose information on an enhanced DBS certificate, which can jeopardise an employment opportunity.</p>
<p>We have had significant success in <a href="https://www.policecautions.uk/category/caution-removals/">expunging police records, including police cautions.</a></p>
<p>Along with applying for the expungement of police records, we also have significant success in appealing <a href="https://www.policecautions.uk/enhanced-dbs/">disclosures of information on enhanced DBS checks</a>.</p>
</div><div class="fusion-title title fusion-title-3 fusion-title-text fusion-title-size-one" style="--awb-margin-top-small:0px;--awb-margin-right-small:0px;--awb-margin-bottom-small:20px;--awb-margin-left-small:0px;"><h1 class="fusion-title-heading title-heading-left" style="margin:0;">Police Caution and DBS Solicitors</h1><span class="awb-title-spacer"></span><div class="title-sep-container"><div class="title-sep sep-double sep-solid" style="border-color:#e0dede;"></div></div></div><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-5"><p>Please get in <a href="https://www.policecautions.uk/contact/">touch today to discuss any police records or DBS case</a>. We are often able to offer reasonable fixed fees or competitive hourly rates.</p>
</div><div class="fusion-clearfix"></div></div></div></div></div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2017/11/08/dbs-barring-list-success/">DBS Barring List Success</a> appeared first on <a href="https://policecautions.uk">Police Caution Removal Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulated Activity with Children: The Law After 1 September 2026 (Supervision Exemption Removed)</title>
		<link>https://policecautions.uk/2017/02/08/regulated-activity-with-children/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Elkins]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2017 21:58:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[DBS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Regulated Activity with Children]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Appeals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Appeals Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Barred Lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Certificate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBS Solicitors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers and Rehabilitation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employers and the DBS]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.policecautions.uk/?p=766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Updated 17 September 2026 to reflect the removal of the supervision exemption by the Crime and Policing Act 2026, in force from 1 September 2026. First published 8 February 2017. "Regulated activity with children" is the legal test that decides whether an organisation can ask for an Enhanced DBS check that includes a search of</p>
<p>The post <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2017/02/08/regulated-activity-with-children/">Regulated Activity with Children: The Law After 1 September 2026 (Supervision Exemption Removed)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://policecautions.uk">Police Caution Removal Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><div class="fusion-fullwidth fullwidth-box fusion-builder-row-3 fusion-flex-container nonhundred-percent-fullwidth non-hundred-percent-height-scrolling" style="--awb-border-radius-top-left:0px;--awb-border-radius-top-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-right:0px;--awb-border-radius-bottom-left:0px;--awb-flex-wrap:wrap;" ><div class="fusion-builder-row fusion-row fusion-flex-align-items-flex-start fusion-flex-content-wrap" style="max-width:1206.4px;margin-left: calc(-4% / 2 );margin-right: calc(-4% / 2 );"><div class="fusion-layout-column fusion_builder_column fusion-builder-column-2 fusion_builder_column_1_1 1_1 fusion-flex-column" style="--awb-bg-size:cover;--awb-width-large:100%;--awb-margin-top-large:0px;--awb-spacing-right-large:1.92%;--awb-margin-bottom-large:0px;--awb-spacing-left-large:1.92%;--awb-width-medium:100%;--awb-spacing-right-medium:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-medium:1.92%;--awb-width-small:100%;--awb-spacing-right-small:1.92%;--awb-spacing-left-small:1.92%;"><div class="fusion-column-wrapper fusion-flex-justify-content-flex-start fusion-content-layout-column"><div class="fusion-text fusion-text-6"><p><em>Updated 17 September 2026 to reflect the removal of the supervision exemption by the Crime and Policing Act 2026, in force from 1 September 2026. First published 8 February 2017.</em></p>
<p>&#8220;Regulated activity with children&#8221; is the legal test that decides whether an organisation can ask for an <a href="https://policecautions.uk/enhanced-dbs/">Enhanced DBS check</a> that includes a search of the <a href="https://policecautions.uk/dbs-barred-list/">Children&#8217;s Barred List</a>, whether it is a criminal offence for a barred person to do the work, and whether the organisation must refer someone to the DBS for possible barring. It matters to anyone who works or volunteers with children — and it matters more than ever to anyone with a police caution, conviction or other police record, because from <strong>1 September 2026</strong> the definition has been widened.</p>
<p>This article explains what regulated activity with children is, what changed on 1 September 2026, who is now caught by it, what is still outside it, and what the change means if you have something on your record that you would rather an employer or club did not see.</p>
<h2>The change in brief</h2>
<ul>
<li>Since 2012, teaching, training, instructing, caring for or supervising children was <strong>not</strong> regulated activity if you did it under the reasonable day-to-day supervision of someone who was themselves in regulated activity. The same &#8220;supervision exemption&#8221; took supervised <em>volunteers</em> in schools, colleges and childcare settings out of regulated activity.</li>
<li><strong>Section 139 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026</strong> removed the supervision exemption in England and Wales, and section 140 made the same change for Northern Ireland. The change was brought into force on <strong>1 September 2026</strong>. It implements a recommendation of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse (IICSA).</li>
<li>From that date, if you teach, train, instruct, care for or supervise children often enough (or overnight), you are in regulated activity <strong>whether or not someone supervises you</strong>. Paid or unpaid, school or sports club, the supervision question no longer arises.</li>
<li>Organisations can now obtain an Enhanced DBS check <strong>with Children&#8217;s Barred List information</strong> for roles that previously only qualified for a standard Enhanced check, or for no check at all. The legislation does not itself make checks compulsory (that turns on sector rules, such as those for schools and registered childcare), but sector guidance (for example <em>Keeping Children Safe in Education 2026</em>) and organisations&#8217; own safer-recruitment policies mean that, in practice, many people will be asked for a new check this autumn.</li>
<li>Scotland is not affected: it operates the separate PVG scheme.</li>
</ul>
<h2>Where the definition comes from</h2>
<p>Regulated activity relating to children is defined in <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/47/schedule/4" rel="nofollow">Schedule 4 to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006</a> (SVGA). The original 2006 definition was very wide. The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 scaled it back to focus, in the Government&#8217;s words at the time, on &#8220;work which involves close and unsupervised contact with vulnerable groups including children&#8221; — and it was the 2012 Act that introduced the supervision exemption which has now been removed.</p>
<p>There are two routes into regulated activity with children: doing one of the listed <strong>activities</strong>, or doing certain <strong>work in a specified establishment</strong>. Both routes are subject to a frequency threshold, explained below.</p>
<h2>Route 1: the listed activities</h2>
<h3>Teaching, training, instruction, care and supervision</h3>
<p>Any form of teaching, training or instruction of children is regulated activity, unless the teaching, training or instruction is merely incidental to teaching, training or instruction of people who are not children. Any form of care for or supervision of children is likewise regulated activity. Both are subject to the frequency test or the period condition (see below).</p>
<p>Before 1 September 2026, these activities were excluded if they were carried out on a regular basis under the day-to-day supervision of another person who was engaging in regulated activity. That exclusion has gone.</p>
<h3>Advice or guidance</h3>
<p>Advice or guidance provided wholly or mainly for children which relates to their physical, emotional or educational well-being is regulated activity if done frequently or if the period condition is satisfied. Legal advice is excluded.</p>
<h3>Moderating online services</h3>
<p>Moderating a public electronic interactive communication service which is likely to be used wholly or mainly by children is regulated activity, provided the moderator has access to the content or contact with users, and the frequency or period condition is met.</p>
<h3>Driving</h3>
<p>Driving a vehicle being used only for conveying children and their carers or supervisors, under prescribed arrangements, is regulated activity subject to the frequency or period condition.</p>
<h3>Personal care</h3>
<p>&#8220;Relevant personal care&#8221; is regulated activity <strong>even if done only once</strong> — the frequency test does not apply. It covers physical assistance with eating or drinking, toileting, washing, bathing or dressing where the child needs help because of age, illness or disability; prompting and supervising a child with those tasks where the child cannot decide for themselves; and training, instruction, advice or guidance about those tasks given to a child who needs it for the same reasons.</p>
<h3>Health care</h3>
<p>Health care provided by, or under the direction or supervision of, a health care professional is regulated activity, again without any frequency requirement. It covers all forms of health care relating to physical or mental health, including palliative care and procedures similar to medical or surgical care. Health care that is <em>not</em> provided by or under the direction or supervision of a health care professional remains outside regulated activity.</p>
<h3>Childminding and fostering</h3>
<p>Registered (or voluntarily registered) childminding on domestic premises for reward is regulated activity, as is fostering, subject to exceptions for family members and certain private fostering arrangements.</p>
<h2>Route 2: work in a specified establishment</h2>
<p>Work — paid or unpaid — in one of the following establishments is regulated activity if it is done frequently or satisfies the period condition, is done for or in connection with the purposes of the establishment, and gives the person the opportunity to have contact with children:</p>
<ul>
<li>schools (including academies and free schools), and other institutions exclusively or mainly for the full-time education of children;</li>
<li>pupil referral units;</li>
<li>nursery schools;</li>
<li>institutions for the detention of children;</li>
<li>children&#8217;s homes;</li>
<li>children&#8217;s centres in England;</li>
<li>childcare premises, including nurseries.</li>
</ul>
<p>(Northern Ireland&#8217;s list of establishments differs slightly.) Occasional or temporary contracted or volunteer work that is <em>not</em> teaching, training, instruction, care or supervision — a plumber called out to fix a boiler, for instance — remains outside regulated activity. A parent&#8217;s own home used to provide childcare for their own child is also excluded.</p>
<p>Before 1 September 2026, a volunteer working in one of these establishments under the day-to-day supervision of a person in regulated activity was excluded. That exclusion has also gone. Paid work (&#8216;work for gain&#8217;, in the statutory language) in a specified establishment was never subject to a supervision exclusion, so nothing changes for paid staff there; the exclusion that has gone applied only to unpaid, supervised work.</p>
<h2>The frequency test and the period condition</h2>
<p>Apart from relevant personal care and health care, an activity only counts as regulated activity if it is carried out <strong>frequently</strong> or satisfies the <strong>period condition</strong>. The Department for Education treats &#8220;frequently&#8221; as once a week or more. The period condition is met if the activity is carried out at any time on more than three days in any period of 30 days, or at any time between 2am and 6am with the opportunity for face-to-face contact with children.</p>
<p>These thresholds are unchanged. That is why the DBS is at pains to say that the removal of the supervision exemption does not make every role involving children regulated activity. A parent who helps at a school fair, or who accompanies a single day trip, is still not in regulated activity. A parent who helps with reading every Tuesday, or who volunteers on an overnight residential, now is.</p>
<h2>Exactly what section 139 removed</h2>
<p>For the lawyers and safeguarding leads, <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2026/20/section/139" rel="nofollow">section 139 of the Crime and Policing Act 2026</a> amends Schedule 4 to the SVGA by omitting:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>paragraph 2(3A)</strong> — the exclusion for teaching, training or instruction carried out under regular day-to-day supervision by a person in regulated activity;</li>
<li><strong>paragraph 2(3B)(b)</strong> — the equivalent exclusion for care or supervision of children carried out under such supervision;</li>
<li><strong>paragraph 2(3C)</strong> — the &#8220;reasonable in all the circumstances&#8221; test for what counted as day-to-day supervision;</li>
<li><strong>paragraph 1(2B)(b)</strong> (together with paragraphs 1(2C) and 1(15)) — the exclusion for supervised volunteers in specified establishments; and</li>
<li><strong>paragraph 5A</strong> — the Secretary of State&#8217;s duty to publish statutory guidance on supervision. The DfE guidance <em>Supervision of activity with children</em> was accordingly withdrawn on 31 August 2026.</li>
</ul>
<p>Section 140 makes corresponding amendments to the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups (Northern Ireland) Order 2007.</p>
<h2>Who is newly caught</h2>
<p>The people most affected are those whose roles were previously kept out of regulated activity <em>only</em> because someone else supervised them. Typical examples now in regulated activity are:</p>
<ul>
<li>assistant or junior coaches at sports clubs who work under a head coach;</li>
<li>parent and other volunteer helpers in classrooms, on residential trips and in after-school clubs;</li>
<li>volunteers at youth groups, uniformed organisations, faith groups, drama and music groups and holiday clubs;</li>
<li>supervised paid staff in settings outside schools — leisure centres, tuition centres, activity providers, museums and arts venues;</li>
<li>students on placement who teach or supervise children under a mentor.</li>
</ul>
<h2>What is still outside regulated activity</h2>
<ul>
<li>Activity that does not meet the frequency test or period condition (with the exception of personal care and health care).</li>
<li>Teaching, training or instruction that is merely incidental to work with adults.</li>
<li>Anything done in the course of a family relationship, or a personal relationship for no commercial consideration (section 58 SVGA).</li>
<li>Supervising a child in the course of the child&#8217;s own employment, unless the child is under 16 and the supervisor is specifically arranged to look after them and is themselves unsupervised.</li>
<li>Occasional or temporary work in a specified establishment that is not teaching, training, instruction, care or supervision.</li>
<li>Health care not provided by or under the direction or supervision of a health care professional; legal advice.</li>
</ul>
<h2>What follows from being in regulated activity</h2>
<p><strong>Enhanced DBS check with barred list.</strong> Only a person engaged (or about to be engaged) in regulated activity can be checked against the Children&#8217;s Barred List. Organisations that could previously obtain only a standard Enhanced check — or no check at all — for a supervised role can now apply for an Enhanced check with Children&#8217;s Barred List information. DBS checks for volunteers remain free of charge, and from 5 October 2026 the fee for a paid Enhanced check falls from £49.50 to £41.</p>
<p><strong>Offences.</strong> It is a criminal offence for a person on the Children&#8217;s Barred List to engage, or seek to engage, in regulated activity with children, and an offence for an organisation knowingly to permit a barred person to do so.</p>
<p><strong>Duty to refer.</strong> A &#8220;regulated activity provider&#8221; has a legal duty to refer a person to the DBS where it removes them from regulated activity (or would have done had they not left) because it believes they have harmed or pose a risk of harm to a child. Because many more organisations are now regulated activity providers in respect of many more roles, the number of referrals — and of people receiving a &#8220;minded to bar&#8221; letter — is likely to rise.</p>
<p><strong>Are checks compulsory?</strong> Neither the 2026 Act nor the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act imposes a general duty to obtain a check; they define who is <em>eligible</em> for which level of check and make it an offence for a barred person to do the work, or for an organisation knowingly to let them. Whether a check is legally required depends on the setting: schools, registered childcare and regulated care settings must obtain Enhanced checks with barred list information under their own regulations. For other organisations — sports clubs, youth groups, faith groups — the obligation is practical rather than statutory. The DBS has also confirmed that there is no legal requirement to suspend someone while a new check is awaited. In practice, however, statutory guidance for schools and colleges, sports governing body rules and organisations&#8217; own policies mean that most people newly in regulated activity will be asked for a check, and many who already hold an Enhanced certificate without barred list information will be asked for a fresh one (unless they are on the Update Service and their existing certificate is of the right type).</p>
<h2>What this means if you have a caution, conviction or other police record</h2>
<p>This is the part that brings people to this site. A wave of first-time Enhanced checks on long-serving volunteers and assistants means a wave of people discovering — sometimes decades after the event — what an Enhanced certificate will show.</p>
<p>An Enhanced DBS certificate will disclose every <strong>unspent</strong> caution or conviction; every <strong>spent</strong> caution or conviction that is not protected by the filtering rules (broadly, any caution for a &#8220;specified&#8221; offence at any time, any conviction for a specified offence or that resulted in a custodial sentence, and any other adult conviction less than 11 years old or adult caution less than six years old); and any other information a chief officer of police reasonably believes to be relevant to the role, which can include allegations that never led to a charge. See <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2019/02/06/what-shows-up-on-an-enhanced-dbs-check/">what shows up on an Enhanced DBS check</a> and our sister site&#8217;s guide to <a href="https://www.legisia.co.uk/blog/do-police-cautions-show-on-an-enhanced-dbs-check/">whether police cautions show on an Enhanced DBS check</a>.</p>
<p>If you are about to be asked for an Enhanced check with barred list information, there are three things worth knowing:</p>
<ol>
<li><strong>A caution can often be deleted before the check is run.</strong> A simple caution is not a conviction and the police can be asked to delete it from the Police National Computer under the national Record Deletion Process, administered through ACRO. Cautions accepted in questionable circumstances, for minor matters, or where the person was never properly told what they were agreeing to are frequently deleted. A caution that no longer exists on the PNC cannot appear on a certificate. See <a href="https://policecautions.uk/police-caution-removal/">police caution removal</a>.</li>
<li><strong>Police &#8220;additional information&#8221; can be challenged.</strong> If a certificate discloses non-conviction information you consider inaccurate, irrelevant or disproportionate, you can dispute it with the DBS and ask for the Independent Monitor to review it. Timing matters: the dispute must be raised promptly after the certificate issues. See <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2019/11/03/can-you-appeal-a-dbs-check/">can you appeal a DBS check?</a></li>
<li><strong>Barring is not automatic and can be resisted.</strong> If an organisation refers you to the DBS, you will be given the chance to make representations before any decision to include you on the Children&#8217;s Barred List, and there is a right of appeal to the Upper Tribunal. Representations made well are the single most effective point of intervention. See <a href="https://policecautions.uk/dbs-appeal/">DBS barring representations and appeals</a>.</li>
</ol>
<h2>Frequently asked questions</h2>
<h3>Does the change apply in Wales, Northern Ireland and Scotland?</h3>
<p>England and Wales (section 139) and Northern Ireland (section 140), all from 1 September 2026. Scotland has its own PVG scheme and is unaffected.</p>
<h3>I already have an Enhanced DBS certificate. Do I need a new one?</h3>
<p>If your existing certificate does not include Children&#8217;s Barred List information and your role is now regulated activity, your organisation is likely to want a new check with barred list information. If you are subscribed to the Update Service, a new check may not be needed, but only if your existing certificate is of the same level and type as the role now requires — a certificate without barred list information cannot be &#8220;upgraded&#8221; through the Update Service.</p>
<h3>Do all volunteers now need an Enhanced check with barred list?</h3>
<p>No. Only those whose activity meets the frequency test or period condition (or involves personal or health care). Occasional helpers remain outside regulated activity, though organisations may still choose to obtain a standard Enhanced check where the role is otherwise eligible.</p>
<h3>Can I still volunteer while my check is pending?</h3>
<p>There is no legal rule requiring you to be stood down while a check is awaited. That is a decision for the organisation under its own safeguarding policy. Schools have a separate DfE service for checking a teacher&#8217;s record which can be used in the interim in some circumstances.</p>
<h3>I accepted a caution years ago. Will it definitely show?</h3>
<p>Not necessarily. Adult simple cautions for non-specified offences are filtered from standard and Enhanced certificates after six years; youth cautions, reprimands and warnings are no longer disclosed at all. Cautions for specified offences (which include most violent and sexual offences and some others) are never filtered, and conditional cautions are disclosed while unspent. Even a caution that would be disclosed can be removed altogether if the police agree to delete it, which is why it is worth taking advice <em>before</em> the check is applied for rather than after the certificate has been seen.</p>
<h2>Need advice?</h2>
<p>We advise people across England, Wales and Northern Ireland on caution and record deletion, disputing Enhanced DBS disclosures, and representations and appeals against barring. If the removal of the supervision exemption means you are facing a check you were not expecting, <a href="https://www.policecautions.uk/contact/">contact us</a> for a confidential discussion.</p>
<p><small>This article is general information about the law of England, Wales and Northern Ireland as at 17 September 2026 and is not legal advice on any individual case. Sources: <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2026/20/section/139" rel="nofollow">Crime and Policing Act 2026, s.139</a>; <a href="https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/47/schedule/4" rel="nofollow">Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Act 2006, Sch 4</a>; <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/change-to-the-definition-of-regulated-activity-with-children-from-1-september-2026" rel="nofollow">DBS: change to the definition of regulated activity with children</a>; <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/regulated-activity-with-children-common-misconceptions-about-the-sept-2026-supervision-exemption-changes" rel="nofollow">DBS: myth-busting the September 2026 changes</a>; <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-or-volunteering-in-regulated-activity-with-children/regulated-activity-removal-of-the-supervision-exemption-comes-into-force-1-september-2026" rel="nofollow">DfE: removal of the supervision exemption</a>; <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/dbs-reduces-fees-for-checks-and-update-service-from-5-october-2026" rel="nofollow">DBS: fee reductions from 5 October 2026</a>.</small></p>
</div></div></div></div></div></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://policecautions.uk/2017/02/08/regulated-activity-with-children/">Regulated Activity with Children: The Law After 1 September 2026 (Supervision Exemption Removed)</a> appeared first on <a href="https://policecautions.uk">Police Caution Removal Solicitors</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
